- Sonnenshein cautions that the SEC’s individualized approach to crypto regulation might hamper innovation within the industry and deter crypto businesses from operating in the US.
- He emphasizes the need for well-defined categories for crypto commodities and securities to address these concerns.
- Sonnenshein believes establishing these clear definitions and regulations will create a more attractive environment for crypto businesses.
Grayscale Investments CEO Michael Sonnenshein in a recent interview with Fox Business, talked about a possible problem for the US economy. According to him if the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) keep dealing with cryptocurrency regulation one issue at a time, it will have a bad impact on the innovative work happening in the country. He’s concerned that this approach might push cryptocurrency companies to leave the US.
Sonnenshein also mentioned that if every little issue in the crypto world has to be resolved in a court of law, it might slow down the progress of new and creative ideas in the field of cryptocurrencies. Instead of being able to focus on developing cool and useful things, companies might spend a lot of time and money dealing with legal battles.
Sonnenshein also said that if the SEC keeps using the courts too much for crypto issues, it could stop the exciting new stuff and might even make crypto companies go to other countries where rules might be more friendly. He wants the US to find a better way to handle these issues without slowing down the exciting innovations in the crypto world. He stated.
“If every crypto issue needs to go to a court of law, then as a country, we are squashing the innovation taking place here”
Sonnenshein Emphasized Clear Definitions for Crypto Types
Sonnenshein emphasized the importance of having clear and separate definitions for two main categories in the crypto world: crypto commodities and crypto securities. This distinction is crucial because it helps everyone understand these types of cryptocurrencies’ different roles. Having well-defined categories can make it easier for regulators, businesses, and investors to know how to treat and interact with these different kinds of digital assets.
Another crucial point Sonnenshein made was about stablecoins, cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value by being tied to assets like traditional currencies or commodities. He stressed that having clear and precise rules for stablecoins is essential. This clarity can help prevent confusion and uncertainties that might arise in how stablecoins are used and regulated.
Sonnenshein’s argument is that by establishing these clear definitions and regulatory guidelines, the US can create a more welcoming environment for crypto-related businesses. When the rules are well-defined and understood, companies are less likely to feel uncertain about operating in the US. This sense of stability can discourage businesses from considering moving to other countries with potentially more favourable regulations. Ultimately, the US can retain crypto businesses by providing a clear and predictable regulatory framework. He stated
“Adding further clarity to this would ensure that companies and people working on crypto don’t leave the U.S. because our regulatory environment is hostile toward the asset class but instead embraces it.“
Sonnenshein also conveyed that the SEC is evaluating the incorrect standards when deciding which Bitcoin ETF should be allowed in the market.
“When I think about the process that the SEC should be undertaking here, it’s not about choosing who succeeds and who doesn’t; it’s about ensuring that comprehensive disclosures are available for investors.”
On Aug. 11, the SEC postponed its verdict on the spot Bitcoin ETF presented by ARK Investment Management. Once it was listed in the Federal Register, the SEC began a public feedback session on the ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF. This represents the latest delay in the regulatory process concerning the sanction of a spot crypto ETF in the U.S.
In essence, his warnings seem valid and there exists a possibility that the authorities are going to take a step back. The million dollar question however is, “when”? When will authorities back out from legal issues in the crypto-sphere? For now, only time will tell.