Key Takeaways:
- Singapore MAS will mandate crypto exchanges to hold customer assets in a trust by year-end.
- Lending and staking services for retail investors to be banned.
- The Monetary Authority of Singapore seeks feedback on draft legislation.
In a decisive move to bolster investor protection, Singapore’s Monetary Authority (MAS) is enforcing stringent regulations on cryptocurrency exchanges. Announced on Monday, these stipulations demand exchanges to segregate customer assets in a trust account before the end of the year.
This resolution comes on the heels of the FTX fiasco in November and is part of Singapore’s commitment to assuring the security of funds and minimizing the potential for misuse or loss. Concurrently, the MAS has declared a ban on lending and staking for retail investors. However, institutional and accredited investors remain exempt from this prohibition.
MAS had initiated consultations on these measures in October 2022, which were well underway before the implosion of FTX. In retrospect, it is pertinent to note MAS’s longstanding vigilance in this arena. As far back as December 2017, MAS had cautioned the public against the speculative nature of cryptocurrencies and the volatility in prices.
Fast-forward to 2022, a year marred by the collapse of major crypto entities like TerraUSD, Voyager Digital, Celsius Network, and BlockFi, culminating in the calamitous downfall of FTX. Consequently, MAS introduced measures in January 2022 to restrict crypto advertising and trivialization of its associated risks.
MAS’s recent announcement also mentions the consultation papers released in October 2022, which proposed measures to mitigate consumer risks in cryptocurrency trading and support the growth of stablecoins. While Singapore is tightening the reins on cryptocurrency trading, other regions like Hong Kong are forging ahead to entice greater participation from individuals and institutions in the crypto sector.
Despite these regulatory advancements, MAS has urged consumers to maintain vigilance, as regulations alone cannot wholly shield them from potential losses due to the speculative nature of digital payment token trading. Are these regulations fear based for the public or a nudge to strict regimens? Only time will tell.
Source
